"To the people who think, the world is comic.  To people who feel, the world is tragic." Horace Walpole

"Sometimes I am thinking, and sometimes I am feeling." Ralph Maltese

"Sick people have such deep and sincere attachments." Blanche Dubois

 

Andrew Part 2

Andrew

Part 2

 

After ten minutes of sliding down the embankment, grabbing hold of weed stalks and thorny bushes along the way, I found myself on the edge of Gore Creek.  I tied on a Parachute Adams and made a few casts behind some boulders and along a fallen log dipping from the opposite bank.

Owners of land in Colorado, unlike owners in many other states, can own streambeds.  I was warned in the flyshop in Vail NOT to wade on the southern side of Gore Creek near the railroad because some rancher owned that half of the stream.  I was careful until I came to a large boulder jutting out from the northern bank.  The only way to negotiate the boulder was to go around it by stepping in the southern portion of Gore Creek.  I looked around, but except for Polley reading her book on the railroad embankment, there was no one.

I stepped in the southern streambed of Gore Creek, and, in four large steps and less than one minute, I was back on the northern streambed of Gore Creek, when a few pebbles landed on my fishing hat.  I looked up at the trestle, a railroad spur crossing over Gore Creek, and there was a tall man in cowboy boots which kicked more pebbles onto me.  His hand was on the pistol in his holster.

Okay…..I forced a wide smile and tipped my hat.  The tall man with the cowboy boots and the pistol stared at me for a while.  He may have been deciding whether or not to shoot me.  He opted to let me live, and just walked away.  Where did he come from?

I stepped out of the water and walked back upstream, this time tying on a Griffith’s Gnat.  Polley saw the man on the trestle too.  “Where did he come from?”  I shrugged my shoulders.

I lived to teach Chaucer and the Canterbury Tales once again.   Andrew’s class had performed especially well on that project in which groups of students, assuming the characters of the pilgrims in Chaucer’s work, competed in a Whose Line Is It tournament.  Andrew, as the Pardoner, was applauded for his participation as that pilgrim, winning several events for his team.  Yet, he only received a 68 on his Canterbury Tales test. He obviously had read the assignment.  What was going on here?  I called him in to discover why.

“Mr. Maltese?”

“Andrew.  Please sit down.”

He dumped his twenty pounds of books on the desk next to mine and straightened the glasses on his nose.

‘’Andrew, I truly enjoy having you as a student in my class.”

The look of worry evaporated on his face and was replaced by a smile.

“Your contributions to class discussions are poignant and reflect deep thought, your collaborative skills, working with your classmates are excellent, and your performances on class projects are exceptional, like the Pardoner you played in the Chaucer project.”

The smile grew wider.

“So, Andrew, I am troubled by your low test scores.  I do not understand how such an intelligent, self-motivated, pleasant young man can get a 68 on the test.   I know you read and took notes on the material.”

The smile quickly faded.  Andrew looked down at his shoes.

“I’m sorry about that.”

“Andrew, you don’t understand.  I did not call you in to criticize you.  I want to understand why your test scores don’t reflect the excellent student that you are.”

Andrew looked up into my eyes, searched for trust, and looked down again.

“I shouldn’t be in this honors class.”

I took off my glasses and tossed them on the desk.  Now I truly did not understand.

“Andrew, why don’t you belong in this class?  I certainly think you belong in this class.  If you don’t, no one does.  Are you an undercover CIA agent tracking expired milk dates in the cafeteria?  Why?  What?”

He replied as if he had a virulent strain of the bubonic plague which would kill him in two days.

“I have dyslexia.”

“Uh huh.”

Andrew looked up at me.   “The letters in the words all look scrambled to me.  I have to unscramble them first and then I look up the words in my pocket dictionary.”

I nodded my head.

“Mr. Maltese, I read all your assignments.  I leave your homework to the last, and by the time I am through it is one or two in the morning.”

“Andrew, if anything, I am more impressed with your work ethic and skills.”

“I don’t do well on the tests because it takes me forever to read the questions.”

“Andrew, now I understand.  We can work around that..”

“I was surprised when you gave me an “A” in English because my quiz and test scores were low.”

“Andrew, first, I did NOT give you an “A.”  You earned that “A” by your work ethic, your intellectual curiosity, and your performance on projects.”

“Mr. M., are you going to transfer me out of honors now?  My mother had to push and yell and stomp her feet to convince my counselor to put me in your honors class.”

“Andrew, you haven’t been listening to me.  You belong in an Honors class, and I am so very honored you are in my honors class.”

We worked it out.  I would create a separate quiz and test for Andrew and I would administer the quiz or test orally during his study hall.  He consistently scored in the nineties.

I made a few casts to some riffles up stream with no takes.  I looked up at Polley reading her Scandinavian mystery.

“You see any good water?”

Polley got out of her chair.  “I was just about to go for a walk.”

“Okay.  Let me know if you see any good holding lies.”

One of my favorite projects involved F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby.  After we read and discussed the conventional themes—-mythologies associated with geographical biases, the dream concept, the “morally corrupt” 1920s, etc.—groups of students would select one of several projects to demonstrate their understanding of character and theme.  Most groups chose the Yearbook Project.  Assuming that Gatsby and Daisy and Tom and the other characters all went to the same high school, what would their yearbook look like.   Students liked to exercise their linguistic and visual skills and jumped into the assignment enthusiastically.  Andrew chose to work alone, which was unusual.

“Hey, I see a trout, a big one, right across from you.”

Polley was high on the embankment pointing straight down to a cluster of rocks next to the bank.  “He’s a nice one….I think a rainbow.”

I maneuvered my way gingerly across the stream to a casting position just downstream of the cluster of rocks.  I checked the Griffith’s Gnat and applied more floatant.  My first cast was a little splashy, and I was afraid I spooked the trout.  A few more casts, more delicate.  Nothing.  I yelled up to Polley.  “Is my fly going over him?”

Polley nodded.  I snipped off the Griffith’s Gnat and tied on a Gary LaFontaine pattern, an Aft Sparkle.  I had tied up about fifty Aft Sparkles after catching a bunch of browns on the pattern on the Rio Janeros in Colorado last year.

Two casts brought nothing.  The midday sun was up and the desert land around Gore Creek embraced the heat and reflected it back onto me.  Time for a break.  I stopped casting and looked around for the guy with the cowboy boots and pistol. He had been an unpleasant surprise.

Andrew’s choice of Great Gatsby projects was a pleasant surprise.  He chose the option of writing music for each of the characters in the novel.  When his turn came, he handed me a list of selections he had written for his clarinet, and across from the piece of music was the name of the character the music described.  His classmates did NOT have the list I was holding in my hand.

Andrew sat in a small chair in front of a small podium which held his score.  Andrew was first clarinet in the school orchestra, so his classmates grew silent as he placed his fingers on the instrument.  He played the first selection and then looked up at the class.

“So which character does that piece represent?”

The class, in unison, responded, “That’s Tom Buchanan!!”

I looked down at the list in my hand.  The piece Andrew played reflected Tom Buchanan!!!!

Andrew played his next piece.

He finished and looked up.  “That’s Daisy!”

I looked at my list.  It was Daisy.

And so it went for twelve characters.

What Andrew had done was to demonstrate his understanding of the novel’s characters by expressing their traits through music.  Did he demonstrate an understanding of character?  Yes he did.  Would he have done well on a paper and pencil test on character?  Maybe not. Did he get an “A” for his project?  Yes he did.

One of the essential concepts that formed my teaching was Howard Gardner’s book  on multiple intelligences.  Schools only focus on two primary intelligences, verbal and mathematical, but students like Andrew are proof that, if given the chance, there are other ways to demonstrate understanding of content.

I snipped off the Aft Sparkle and rummaged through my dry fly box searching for that magic pattern that would fool that trout by the cluster of rocks.  I decided on a Foxy Quill, size 16.  I yelled up to Polley.  “Is he still there?”

Polley was standing on the embankment, hands on hips, watching that trout.  I made another cast upstream, just above the cluster of rocks, and watched intently the Foxy Quill float right over the trout’s position.  I braced for the take.  Nothing.

Another cast.  Same result.

Then I noticed something I should have noticed earlier. I shouted up to Polley.  “Which way is he facing?”

Trout face upstream, the current becoming a conveyor belt of food for them.

Polley yelled back.  “He’s facing downstream.”

Of course!  The cluster of rocks formed an eddy, and the food chain swirled around the rocks and that clever old trout was feeding in the back channel.

I made my next cast downstream and into the eddy and the rainbow took it immediately.  He was huge, taking me upstream and downstream and tail walking at least four times. I held on, to the trout as well as to my heart which was thumping wildly and loudly against my chest.

I worked the nineteen inch rainbow into a current of slow moving water, picked him up to show Polley when his body suddenly contorted and he was out of my hand, out of my control, the 5X tippet snapping and he was gone.  Just another style of catch and release.

Once my heartbeat sought its normal level, I thought about the problem.  I broke with convention when I presented the dry fly downstream rather than upstream in order to get it into the trout’s window.   There are a number of ways to demonstrate proficiency.  That rainbow on Gore Creek helped teach me that.  And Andrew was able to present his proficiency through his clarinet performance. Those experiences convinced me that I had to create other opportunities for my students to demonstrate their knowledge and their proficiencies.

 

 

 

Andrew Part 1

Andrew

Part 1

 

I looked down the embankment from the railroad tracks.  My weight was already shifting under the loose gravel and sandy earth, and I visualized myself slipping and sliding down this bank and plunging into Gore Creek below. That would be a shame on a nice morning like this.  To my right, a little over a half mile away, Interstate 70 ran east-west out of Vail into Copper Mountain or, in the opposite direction, to Grand Junction.  I stood on the track mustering the courage to work my way down to the stream and wondered what the Interstate looked like during the skiing months.  Bumper to bumper, maybe, as opposed to this July day when traffic was heavy but steadily moving.

“Be careful going down.  It looks pretty steep.”  Polley was unfolding her streamside chair.  She became an expert at reading water.  “That eddy over there looks promising.”  It did, but first I would have to survive getting down to the water.

That school year I was doing better than surviving teaching Andrew’s Honors class.  Henry Bouquet High School prospered from a change in principals, and, after publishing an article about collaborative learning that received some note (and the school district some positive publicity), I found myself released from the dog house after twenty years.  I was assigned an honors class.  My former principal referred to my collaborative learning methodology as “that group work crap.”  He liked lecturing…every day…..for one hundred and eighty six days a year.

 

I rarely lectured in my classes.  I thought students should be engaged in high level thinking as opposed to low level listening, so I tried to create projects that would improve those neural pathways.  Many of Andrew’s classmates were highly motivated, mostly by grades, but Andrew was one of those who exhibited genuine intellectual curiosity.  He applied the adage, “Information is only useless if you do not use it.”

 

“So, we are going to study Geoffrey Chaucer and his work, The Canterbury Tales, but before we do, let’s develop a context for his poetry by sharing what we know about the Medieval Period.”

And so we shared what we knew or thought we knew about the Medieval Period.

Michael raised his hand.  “Is this gonna be on a test?”  Michael was solely motivated by grades, and he was disappointed in his last group grade.  He had let his group down by not doing his share of work and research.

My answer to this question was always the same.  “You ARE accountable for this material.”

Michael let out a colossal groan.  “Why do we have to look at this crap?!  Why can’t we study something relevant?”
Every year someone in class moaned about relevancy, and every year I waited for this teachable moment.

“All right, Michael.  What would you like to study that is relevant?”
Michael sat up. “How about that thing about Milli Vanilli? They got caught lip synching their album.”

“How is that relevant to your life?”

Michael looked at the ceiling and thought.

Andrew raised his hand.  “The Milli Vanilli thing is topical….not necessarily relevant.”

What a great kid!

“Great point, Andrew.”  Andrew was tall and very thin with dark brown framed glasses.  If he starred in a western he would be called “Slim.”  Some Andrews would choose to be called by his friends “Andy,” but “Andy” did not, like a baggy and draping suit, sit well with this young man.   Andrew was never absent, always participated in class, and did more than his fair share of work.  However, his test and quiz scores were abysmal.  I wondered why.

“So what is the difference between something that is relevant and something that is topical?”

They thought in silence.

“Okay.  Have you heard your parents complain about taxes?”
Everyone nodded their heads.

“How about the possibility of war?”

More nodding.

“How about disease?”  The Aids epidemic was filling the nightly news.

More nodding.

“So would you say that taxes, the threat of war and disease are topics that are relevant?”  Again nodding.

We were all on the same page.

“Barbara Tuchman, an historian, wrote a book, A Distant Mirror, a book about life in the fourteenth century.  She called it ‘a distant mirror,” because what people in Europe feared at that time were taxes, war and plague.  So how relevant to our own time would that be?”
Majorie shouted out, “Very relevant.”

“When we watch the nightly news and hear that there was a fire in a store in Center City or that Milli Vanilli got caught lip synching their album, those facts might be interesting but how relevant are they to your lives?”

Benjamin raised his hand.  “Relevant if it was your store!”

Laughter.

“True.  Let me give you another example.   I have in one hand a radio built in 1990, and one manufactured in 1932.  Which one is the better radio?

Lots of shoutouts.  “The one made in 1990!”

Okay.  Now.  Imagine I have two paintings here.  One in the left hand, one in the right. All you can see is the back of both paintings.  I tell you the one on the left was painted in 1990.  The one on the right was painted in 1654.  Which one is the better painting?

Benjamin raised his hand.  “You can’t tell.”
“Why not?  Why isn’t it the newer one?”
Andrew raised his hand.  “Art isn’t like technology.  Newer does not always mean better.”

“You all agree?”

Everyone, including Michael, nodded.

“So, do you also agree that something old can be relevant and something new, while topical, can be irrelevant?”

Again, general consensus.  “So let’s give Chaucer a chance and see if The Canterbury Tales are relevant.  Okay?”

Relevancy and topicalism are tricky things.  I saw many young teachers go down in flames trying to be topical and thus “cool” with their students.   By the time I learned what was new in student pop culture, it was old.  I learned my first year of teaching in northern New Jersey not even to try to be hip.  To earn my student teaching credits I had a Cooperating Teacher from a nearby university come out every two weeks to observe me.  Mr. Farley, in his eighties, took ten minutes to work his way from the door of my classroom to his seat in the back of the room. He always observed the same class because, as he confided in me, it fit in with his lunch and nap schedule.  The class that fit in with his lunch and nap schedule consisted of juniors, five of whom wore ankle bracelets for tracking by the local gendarmes, four of whom were in the middle stages of pregnancy, six of whom had failed this class before and none of whom were interested in British poetry, which I was required to teach.  I started each class demanding they remove the headphones blaring Heavy Metal music from their heads.

Mr. Farley had a tendency to contribute his observations on the content under study.

One day, as I tried to explain to this class the nuances of Robert Burns’ “To a Mouse,” and the concept of fate as a determining factor, Mr. Farley chimed in.

“Yes….Robert Burns….yes  yes yes.”  A few students lifted their heads off their desks.

“Robert Burns……Scottish poet…..yes yes yes….Harry Lauter.  You all have heard of Harry Lauter, haven’t you?”

Receiving no response, Mr. Farley looked at me.  “Yes yes yes.  Harry Lauter.  You certainly have heard of Harry Lauter, haven’t you?”

I shook my head.  The students were quietly attentive, but if this Harry Lauter thing went on, I was going to lose them.

Mr. Farley looked puzzled that I had not heard of Harry Lauter.  “Harry Lauter, actor AND singer?”

I shook my head again.

“That’s strange.  Harry Lauter, yes yes yes, was a singer noted for singing Scottish ballads.  Yes yes yes. He sang many ballads that came from the poetry of Robert Burns.”

Mr. Farley stared into the unblinking eyes of twenty six students…and one teacher.

“Hmmmm.  Yes yes yes.  Harry Lauter was big in my time….”  Mr. Farley sought a relevancy.  “Yes yes yes.   Harry Lauter was to my generation as as as …..as Harry Belafonte is to yours.”

Not a few students turned to each other and blinked.   Harry Belafonte?  Who he?

Since that experience I never again sought to be a hip teacher.